They figured out how many days in a year and when the world will end.
They had an exremley accurate calanders, one for recent dates, a date far in the past or future, on for the moon, and one for venus.
They were so good at astronomy that they could predict when Venus was visible. Venus was extrmely important to them, and was seen as "defeating" the sun and the moon, perhaps because of its persistent visibility after transitions from day-into-night
Many scholars have attempted to account for the diffusion of Western scientific knowledge in Latin America and the Third World. Negative interpretations have overemphasized Latin America's passivity and patterns of cultural and economic dependency to explain the region's stunted scientific development. They have also used the history of science in Latin America as a foil for the technological and scientific successes of the West--identifying conditions that have purportedly made scientific and technological successes possible in other parts of the world (e.g., the Puritan Reformation and vigorous industrial development).But a more positive point of view can yield strikingly different historical narratives. Latin Americans have been able to create rich and complex national scientific traditions in conditions of adversity that include shortages of funds for salaries and equipment, small libraries, inadequate supplies, and political instability disrupting the continuity of scientific work. Overcoming these difficulties, Latin Americans have contributed significantly to the world's store of knowledge. Tropical medicine and physiology at the turn of the twentieth century illustrate this: Carlos Chagas, a microbiologist in Rio de Janeiro, discovered the parasite trypanosome responsible for a disease affecting Brazilian peasants that now bears his name. The Cuban Carlos Finlay identified the vector of yellow fever. The Peruvian Carlos Monge studied the effects of high-altitude in human beings and animals. The Argentine physiologist Bernardo Houssay related hypophysis with diabetes mellitus and received a Nobel Prize in 1947. Though "pure" science has not attracted large numbers of devotees and patrons in the region, rich traditions have emerged in "applied" fields of natural history, medicine (including public health and technology). This chapter's positive approach to the history of science in Latin America examines the institutional and social contexts in which scientific ideas and practices have evolved. Given the rich colonial and post-colonial history of the area, this chapter also explores the history of transference, adaptation, and hybridization of knowledge. It delves into a multiplicity of topics, including the scientific and technical legacies of Amerindian civilizations; the dynamic and traumatic cultural encounter of conflicting representations of nature; and the arrival and creative assimilation of Western knowledge and institutions in colonial (1492-1820s) and post-colonial (1820s-1990s) societies. A survey of the history of science and technology in Latin America should first come to grips with the remarkable contributions to arithmetic, botany, astronomy, and metallurgy of the ancient Mesoamerican and Andean civilizations. Unfortunately, the scientific and technical accomplishments of these civilizations, as well as their continuity, adaptation, and mutation in the wake of European colonization, are incompletely understood and require further investigation. The history of science in colonial Latin America also deserves greater study. A secular-liberal reading of the colonial past widely accepted during the early nineteenth-century still influences many scholars. According to this view, even though Spain instituted vigorous colonial cultural policies that included the early creation of universities (which opened some one hundred years earlier than North America's Harvard), Spain's commitment to religious intolerance (Inquisition) and to an old-fashioned scholastic mentality stifled scientific institutions and methods. But it is becoming increasingly clear that Western scientific ideas, institutions, and activities significantly affected the Iberian colonies. Initially they legitimized European colonialist practices. Later they became central to imperial policies of economic renewal. By the end of the colonial period they would play a major role in creating discourses of national identity among the local elites.
After independence, scientific institutions and practices declined in the wake of destruction brought about by the wars. Nevertheless, medical doctors, naturalists, military engineers, and savants assumed important sociopolitical roles. They became leading figures in the state bureaucracy, identified raw materials of possible commercial value for the non-industrialized export economies, used scientific rhetoric to settle political debates (by the second half of the nineteenth century Positivism became the leading elite ideology), and deployed scientific knowledge and imagery to consolidate national ideologies.As the new nation-states began slowly to consolidate, scientific institutions and practices recovered their prominence. Many European scientists (particularly naturalists) arrived in Latin America in the second half of the nineteenth century and along with local scientific communities helped to map and catalog national resources. They also created the technical and financial conditions for extending the reach of the state through developments of railroads, telegraphs, mining, export agriculture, and public health. In the twentieth century, scientific discourses and their accompanying ideological and socio-economic practices have continued to evolve through periods of profound social, political, and economic change. Students need to be aware that this introduction to the region's rich history of science is considerably limited by the available resources in English secondary literature we review. A large corpus of knowledge in Spanish, Portuguese, and French beckons those with the linguistic skills to exploit them.
Important themes highlighted in the following are:
the scholarship on the history of science and medicine of an important region of the "Third World"
contemporary debates on the implications of scientific and technical change from the perspective of the so-called periphery
the complex and often conflicting relationship between the scientific and professional elites of "underdeveloped" countries and those of North America and Europe
the independent and interacting influence of national and international factors on the development of science in Latin America
the indigenous reactions to scientific programs and ideas of progress
Science in Latin America: Is there hope?:
http://www.iups.org/nl3/latorre.pdf
Timeline: History of Science in Central America
http://www.google.com/#q=history+of+science+in+central+america&hl=en&prmd=ivns&tbs=tl:1&tbo=u&ei=VfQlTcnsC8H7lweEw7mWAQ&sa=X&oi=timeline_result&ct=title&resnum=11&ved=0CFkQ5wIwCg&fp=7b989c6c17f79c85
Timeline: History of Technology in Central America
http://www.google.com/#q=history+of+technology+in+central+america&hl=en&sa=X&prmd=ivns&tbs=tl:1&tbo=u&ei=xPUlTc3AE4T7lweGuuT0AQ&oi=timeline_result&ct=title&resnum=11&ved=0CGMQ5wIwCg&fp=7b989c6c17f79c85
Important themes highlighted in the following are: